From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Saldierna

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sep 24, 2015
368 N.C. 356 (N.C. 2015)

Opinion

No. 271PA15.

2015-09-24

STATE of North Carolina v. Felix Ricardo SALDIERNA.

W. Rob Heroy, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for Saldierna, Felix. Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.


W. Rob Heroy, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for Saldierna, Felix. Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.
R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 3rd of August 2015 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

“Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015.”

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd of August 2015 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

“Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015.”

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).


Summaries of

State v. Saldierna

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sep 24, 2015
368 N.C. 356 (N.C. 2015)
Case details for

State v. Saldierna

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Carolina v. Felix Ricardo SALDIERNA.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Sep 24, 2015

Citations

368 N.C. 356 (N.C. 2015)
776 S.E.2d 846

Citing Cases

State v. Watson

Defendant contends that assuming the record is ambiguous as to whether he invoked his right to have his…