From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rowe

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 21, 1939
5 A.2d 697 (N.J. 1939)

Opinion

Submitted February 17, 1939 —

Decided April 21, 1939.

On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 116 N.J.L. 48.

For the defendant in error, David T. Wilentz, attorney-general, and Alexander F. Ormsby, assistant attorney-general.

For the plaintiff in error, Thomas Brunetto.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Rowe

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 21, 1939
5 A.2d 697 (N.J. 1939)
Case details for

State v. Rowe

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HAROLD ROWE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 21, 1939

Citations

5 A.2d 697 (N.J. 1939)
122 N.J.L. 466