From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Roseboro

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1971
183 S.E.2d 108 (N.C. 1971)

Summary

In State v. Roseboro, 279 N.C. 391, 183 S.E.2d 108, filed September 7, 1971, for the reasons there stated by Justice Branch, this Court remanded the cause to the Superior Court of Cleveland County for the pronouncement of judgment imposing a sentence of life imprisonment.

Summary of this case from State v. Roseboro

Opinion

No. 105

Filed 7 September 1971

Homicide 31; Criminal Law 135 — first-degree murder — death sentence — remand for sentence of life imprisonment Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, a first-degree murder case in which the defendant received the death sentence is remanded to the superior court with direction that the defendant be sentenced to life imprisonment in the State's prison.

ON remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.


Justices HIGGINS and LAKE dissenting.


At the trial of defendant, Robert Louis Roseboro, at April 28, 1969 Criminal Session of the Superior Court of CLEVELAND County, North Carolina, the jury returned a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree and thereupon the court pronounced judgment which imposed a death sentence. Upon defendant's appeal, this Court found "No error" in the trial and judgment. State v. Roseboro, 276 N.C. 185, 171 S.E.2d 886 (1970). On June 28, 1971, upon its consideration of defendant's petition for writ of certiorari, the Supreme Court of the United States entered the following order: "The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment, insofar as it imposes the death sentence, is reversed, United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 (1968), Pope v. United States, 392 U.S. 651 (1968), and the case is remanded for further proceedings." Robert Louis Roseboro, Petitioner v. North Carolina, 403 U.S. 948, 29 L.Ed.2d 860, 91 S.Ct. 2289 (1971).

Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, this cause is remanded to the Superior Court of Cleveland County with directions to proceed as follows:

1. The presiding judge of the Superior Court of Cleveland County will cause to be served on the defendant, Robert Louis Roseboro, and on his attorneys of record, notice to appear during a session of said superior court at a designated time, not less than ten days from the date of the order, at which time, in open court, the defendant, Robert Louis Roseboro, being present in person and being represented by his attorneys, the presiding judge, based on the verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree returned by the jury at the trial at the April 28, 1969 Criminal Session, will pronounce judgment that the defendant Robert Louis Roseboro, be imprisoned for life in the State's prison.

2. The presiding judge of the superior court of Cleveland County will issue a writ of habeas corpus to the official having custody of the defendant, Robert Louis Roseboro, to produce him in open court at the time and for the purpose of being present when the judgment imposing life imprisonment is pronounced.

Remanded for judgment.

Justices HIGGINS and LAKE dissent for the reasons stated in their separate dissenting opinions filed this day in State v. Hill, ante 371, 183 S.E.2d 97 (1971).


Summaries of

State v. Roseboro

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1971
183 S.E.2d 108 (N.C. 1971)

In State v. Roseboro, 279 N.C. 391, 183 S.E.2d 108, filed September 7, 1971, for the reasons there stated by Justice Branch, this Court remanded the cause to the Superior Court of Cleveland County for the pronouncement of judgment imposing a sentence of life imprisonment.

Summary of this case from State v. Roseboro
Case details for

State v. Roseboro

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ROBERT LOUIS ROSEBORO

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1971

Citations

183 S.E.2d 108 (N.C. 1971)
183 S.E.2d 108

Citing Cases

State v. Westbrook

The presiding judge of the Superior Court of Mecklenburg County will issue a writ of habeas corpus to the…

State v. Summers

Of course, the trial courts are, as this Court is, bound by the decision in Furman. State v. Hill, 279 N.C.…