From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rollo

COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS OF DELAWARE
Nov 26, 1901
54 A. 683 (Del. Gen. Sess. 1901)

Opinion

11-26-1901

STATE v. ROLLO.

Herbert H. Ward, Atty. Gen., and Robert H. Richards, Dep. Atty. Gen., for the State.


John Rollo was indicted for larceny, and moved to quash the indictment. Motion overruled.

The indictment charged, on August 1, 1901, the larceny, by the defendant, of certainbooks, giving the value of the same, "of the goods and chattels of Wilmington institute," etc.

Argued before LORE, G. J., and SPRUANCE and GRUBB, JJ.

Robert Adair, for defendant, moved to quash the indictment as insufficient because it did not allege that the Wilmington institute, whose property was alleged to have been stolen by the defendant, was a corporation, or an association of persons, or indicate in any way what it was; and, furthermore, it did not aver the correct corporate name thereof.

Herbert H. Ward, Atty. Gen., and Robert H. Richards, Dep. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Where the name of a corporation is stated as owner, there need be no averment that it is a corporation.

It is sufficient to allege and prove the name by which a corporation is generally known.

PER CURIAM. Indictment sustained.

The defendant thereupon entered a plea of guilty.


Summaries of

State v. Rollo

COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS OF DELAWARE
Nov 26, 1901
54 A. 683 (Del. Gen. Sess. 1901)
Case details for

State v. Rollo

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. ROLLO.

Court:COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS OF DELAWARE

Date published: Nov 26, 1901

Citations

54 A. 683 (Del. Gen. Sess. 1901)
3 Pen. 421

Citing Cases

State v. Carson

(1) The circuit court held that the information is insufficient because it does not allege that the bank was…

Stewart v. State

All that is required to be alleged in this regard in charging the crime of larceny in a building are facts…