From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rivera

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 10, 2020
335 Conn. 975 (Conn. 2020)

Opinion

11-10-2020

STATE of Connecticut v. Xavier RIVERA

Lisa J. Steele, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Kathryn W. Bare, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Lisa J. Steele, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Kathryn W. Bare, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 200 Conn. App. 487, 240 A.3d 728 (2020), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting into evidence a compact disc containing an audio recording of a conversation between Alexis Vilar and the defendant?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it directed the jury to disregard the portion of defense counsel's closing argument indicating that the state never had asked an eyewitness, Jesus Rodriguez, to make an incourt identification of the defendant?"


Summaries of

State v. Rivera

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 10, 2020
335 Conn. 975 (Conn. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Rivera

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Xavier RIVERA

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Nov 10, 2020

Citations

335 Conn. 975 (Conn. 2020)
335 Conn. 975

Citing Cases

State v. Rivera

And (2) "Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it…