From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Riley

Supreme Court of New Mexico
May 26, 2022
No. S-1-SC-37721 (N.M. May. 26, 2022)

Opinion

S-1-SC-37721

05-26-2022

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DALLAS RILEY, Defendant-Petitioner.

Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Caitlin C.M. Smith, Assistant Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM for Petitioner Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General John Kloss, Assistant Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Respondent


This decision of the Supreme Court of New Mexico was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Supreme Court.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI Karen L. Townsend, District Judge

Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Caitlin C.M. Smith, Assistant Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM for Petitioner

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General John Kloss, Assistant Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Respondent

DISPOSITIONAL ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, CHIEF JUSTICE

{¶1} WHEREAS, the Court granted Defendant Dallas Riley's petition for writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals determination that the district court erred in ruling that the blood test results at issue were inadmissible because the district court misapprehended State v. Adams, 2019-NMCA-043, 447 P.3d 1142 and NMSA 1978, Section 66-8-103 (1978); and

{¶2} WHEREAS, the Court ordered that this case be held in abeyance pending the Court's disposition of State v. Adams, 2022-NMSC-008, 503 P.3d 1130; and

{¶3} WHEREAS, this Court issued an opinion in Adams, id.; and

{¶4} WHEREAS, the Court concludes that the issue of law presented in this case was addressed by the Court's opinion in Adams, id.; and

{¶5} WHEREAS, the Court exercises its discretion under Rule 12-405(B)(1) NMRA to dispose of this case by nonprecedential order rather than a formal opinion;

{¶6} NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the memorandum opinion of the Court of Appeals is affirmed, and the matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with Adams, 2022-NMSC-008.

{¶7} IT IS SO ORDERED.

C. SHANNON BACON, Justice, DAVID K. THOMSON, Justice, JULIE J. VARGAS, Justice

BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Justice, not participating


Summaries of

State v. Riley

Supreme Court of New Mexico
May 26, 2022
No. S-1-SC-37721 (N.M. May. 26, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Riley

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DALLAS RILEY…

Court:Supreme Court of New Mexico

Date published: May 26, 2022

Citations

No. S-1-SC-37721 (N.M. May. 26, 2022)