From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Richard Knutson, Inc.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Mar 14, 1995
191 Wis. 2d 395 (Wis. 1995)

Summary

remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification

Summary of this case from State v. Morris

Opinion

No. 93-1898-CR.

Oral argument November 30, 1994. —

Decided March 14, 1995.

APPEAL from a judgment of conviction from the Circuit Court for Waukesha County on certification from the Court of Appeals: James R. Kieffer, Circuit Judge. Decision to certify vacated and cause remanded.

For the defendant-appellant there were briefs by John H. Hinderaker, Scott W. Johnson, Ann Marie Hanrahan and Faegre Benson, Minneapolis, MN and oral argument by Ann Marie Hanrahan and Scott W. Johnson.

For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Daniel J. O'Brien, assistant attorney general with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney general.


The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County. Justice DAY, Justice ABRAHAMSON, and Justice BABLITCH would affirm. Chief Justice HEFFERNAN, Justice STEINMETZ, and Justice GESKE would reverse. Justice WILCOX did not participate.

Upon consideration, we conclude that the better course of action when a certification or bypass results in a tie vote by this court is to vacate our decision to certify or bypass and remand to the court of appeals. We thus overrule Wisconsin Pub. Power, Inc. Sys. v. Thompson, 174 Wis.2d 705, 497 N.W.2d 723 (1993), and Local 257 of Hotel Restaurant Employees Bartenders Int'l Union v. Wilson St. East Dinner Playhouse, Inc., 126 Wis.2d 284, 375 N.W.2d 664 (1985).

A petition for review comes to this court after a full review and opinion by the court of appeals. If the result here is a tie vote, thus affirming the court of appeals' decision, the parties at the least have had a full review and opinion by an appellate court. Not so in the case of a tie vote in this court on a certification or bypass. If we allow the circuit court's decision to stand, the parties have in effect been denied a full appellate review and opinion. We conclude justice is better served in such an instance by remanding to the court of appeals for their consideration.

Accordingly, we vacate our decision to certify and remand to the court of appeals.

By the Court. — Decision to certify vacated and cause remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Richard Knutson, Inc.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Mar 14, 1995
191 Wis. 2d 395 (Wis. 1995)

remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification

Summary of this case from State v. Morris

remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification

Summary of this case from Gramling v. Am. Cyanamid Co.

remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification

Summary of this case from News v. City of Richmond

remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification

Summary of this case from Metropolitan Milwaukee Ass'n. Co. Inc. v. City of Milwaukee

remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification

Summary of this case from Polsky v. Virnich

remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification

Summary of this case from Wisconsin v. Point

remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification

Summary of this case from Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. Doyle

remaining to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification

Summary of this case from Wenke v. Gehl Co.

remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification

Summary of this case from Guzman v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc.

remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification

Summary of this case from State v. Deborah J.Z

In State v. Richard Knutson, Inc., 191 Wis.2d 395, 528 N.W.2d 430 (1995), this court vacated its decision to certify the question presented by the court of appeals, because, after oral argument, the court was equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the judgment of the circuit court.

Summary of this case from State v. Sample

remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification

Summary of this case from State v. Watson
Case details for

State v. Richard Knutson, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RICHARD KNUTSON, INC.…

Court:Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Date published: Mar 14, 1995

Citations

191 Wis. 2d 395 (Wis. 1995)
528 N.W.2d 430

Citing Cases

News v. City of Richmond

We have previously stated that when a tie vote occurs in this court on a bypass or certification, “justice is…

State v. Sample

The Richard Knutson court was not asked to determine the number of human beings included in the term…