From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Raynor

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2018
330 Conn. 910 (Conn. 2018)

Opinion

09-20-2018

STATE of Connecticut v. Donald RAYNOR

Andrew P. O'Shea, Wethersfield, in support of the petition. James A. Killen, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 181 Conn.App. 760, 189 A.3d 652 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had properly denied the defendant's motion for a Porter hearing to determine the reliability of fire-arm and toolmark identification?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had properly denied the defendant's motion in limine to limit the scope of the testimony of the state's expert on firearm and toolmark analysis?

"3. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had properly admitted the uncharged misconduct evidence?"


Summaries of

State v. Raynor

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2018
330 Conn. 910 (Conn. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Raynor

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Donald RAYNOR

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Sep 20, 2018

Citations

330 Conn. 910 (Conn. 2018)
193 A.3d 49

Citing Cases

State v. Raynor

And (3) "[d]id the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had properly admitted the…