From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Provost

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 29, 1998
722 A.2d 808 (Conn. 1998)

Opinion

(16012)

Sheila A. Huddleston and James W. Bergenn, in support of the petition.

Judith Rossi, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

Decided September 29, 1998


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 56 (AC 15651) is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the trial court improperly preclude the cross-examination of a prosecution witness?

"2. Was the state's attorney's closing argument improper and is it reviewable under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 (1989)?"


Summaries of

State v. Provost

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 29, 1998
722 A.2d 808 (Conn. 1998)
Case details for

State v. Provost

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RICHARD E. PROVOST

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Sep 29, 1998

Citations

722 A.2d 808 (Conn. 1998)
247 Conn. 914

Citing Cases

State v. Provost

Thereafter, the defendant successfully sought certification to appeal on the following issues: (1) "Did the…