From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Polanco

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Apr 6, 2011
17 A.2d 69 (Conn. 2011)

Opinion

Decided April 6, 2011


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 126 Conn. App. 323 (AC 31516), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court correctly merged the lesser included offense into the sentence on the greater offense, pursuant to State v. Chicano, 216 Conn. 699, 584 A.2d 425 (1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1254, 111 S. Ct. 2898, 115 L. Ed. 2d 1062 (1991), rather than dismiss the conviction on the lesser offense?"

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18771.

Elizabeth M. Inkster, senior assistant public defender, and Daniel M. Erwin, certified legal intern, in support of the petition.

Melissa Patterson, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Polanco

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Apr 6, 2011
17 A.2d 69 (Conn. 2011)
Case details for

State v. Polanco

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CARLOS POLANCO

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Apr 6, 2011

Citations

17 A.2d 69 (Conn. 2011)
300 Conn. 933

Citing Cases

State v. Polanco

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: “Did the…