From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Phillips

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 23, 1961
167 A.2d 175 (N.J. 1961)

Opinion

Argued January 9, 1961 —

Decided January 23, 1961.

Mr. William C. Brudnick, Special Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent ( Mr. Guy W. Calissi, Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney).

Mr. Charles Handler argued the cause for appellant.


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. 62 N.J. Super. 70 (1960). Moreover, we conclude that the record reveals no substantial state or federal constitutional question which would justify direct appeal to this Court. R.R. 1:2-1; Colacurcio Contracting Corp. v. Weiss, 20 N.J. 258 (1955); Starego v. Soboliski, 11 N.J. 29 (1952).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Phillips

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 23, 1961
167 A.2d 175 (N.J. 1961)
Case details for

State v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HAROLD PHILLIPS…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 23, 1961

Citations

167 A.2d 175 (N.J. 1961)
167 A.2d 175

Citing Cases

State v. West

The statutory agreement contains no word which may be taken to indicate an intention to confer jurisdiction…

State v. Thompson

" Thus, even if defendants were granted an extradition type hearing, they would be unable to offer any…