From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pender

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 12, 1995
661 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 1995)

Opinion

No. 85042.

October 12, 1995.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions, Fifth District — Nos. 93-1832 and 93-1942 (Orange County).

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; and Mark S. Dunn and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, for Petitioner.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Noel A. Pelella, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.


We have for review Pender v. State, 647 So.2d 957 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), which expressly and directly conflicts with the opinion in State v. Schopp, 653 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The decision below is quashed and this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of Schopp.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and SHAW, KOGAN, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

HARDING, J., dissents with an opinion, in which OVERTON, J., concurs.


I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this case for the reasons expressed in my dissent in State v. Schopp, 653 So.2d 1016, 1022 (Fla. 1995) (Harding, J., dissenting).

OVERTON, J., concurs.


Summaries of

State v. Pender

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 12, 1995
661 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 1995)
Case details for

State v. Pender

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. KEVIN WALTER PENDER, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 12, 1995

Citations

661 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 1995)

Citing Cases

Pender v. State

Pender v. State, 647 So.2d 957 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), review granted, 654 So.2d 920 (Fla. 1995).State v.…

Pender v. State

The district court, relying on this Court's decision in Smith v. State, 500 So.2d 125 (Fla. 1986), originally…