From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Paye

Supreme Court of Iowa
Nov 10, 2022
No. 19-1760 (Iowa Nov. 10, 2022)

Summary

noting the issue and listing the justices on each side

Summary of this case from Planned Parenthood of Heartland, Inc. v. Reynolds ex rel. State

Opinion

19-1760

11-10-2022

STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, v. PRINCE G. PAYE, Appellant.


Polk County No. AGCR329495

ORDER

Susan Larson Christensen Chief Justice

The court, May, J., taking no part, being evenly divided, declares this case affirmed by operation of law. See Iowa Code § 602.4107 (2022).

The district court's denial of Paye's motion to suppress stands. Waterman, Mansfield, and McDonald, JJ., would vacate the decision of the court of appeals and affirm the judgment of the district court on the suppression issue; Christensen, C.J., and Oxley and McDermott, JJ., would affirm the decision of the court of appeals and reverse the judgment of the district court on that issue. The decision of the court of appeals is vacated, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See State v. Effler, 769 N.W.2d 880, 884 (Iowa 2009) ("[W]hen the supreme court is equally divided . . ., the decision of the district court is affirmed by operation of law.").


Summaries of

State v. Paye

Supreme Court of Iowa
Nov 10, 2022
No. 19-1760 (Iowa Nov. 10, 2022)

noting the issue and listing the justices on each side

Summary of this case from Planned Parenthood of Heartland, Inc. v. Reynolds ex rel. State
Case details for

State v. Paye

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, v. PRINCE G. PAYE, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of Iowa

Date published: Nov 10, 2022

Citations

No. 19-1760 (Iowa Nov. 10, 2022)

Citing Cases

Planned Parenthood of Heartland, Inc. v. Reynolds ex rel. State

We have consistently adhered to the practice of not issuing opinions since Effler. See, e.g., Order, State…