From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Paul

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Nov 2, 2016
202 So. 3d 995 (La. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15–KP–2278

11-02-2016

State of Louisiana v. Kerry J. Paul


:

Writ granted. The district court's ruling dismissing relator's actual innocence claim is reversed and the claim is remanded for consideration after an evidentiary hearing. See State v. Pierre, 13–0873, p. 4 (La. 10/15/13), 125 So.3d 403, 409 (new evidence of actual innocence must be so compelling that no reasonable juror could have voted to convict with knowledge thereof); State v. Conway, 01–2808 (La. 4/12/02), 816 So.2d 290, 291 (assuming post-conviction claims of actual innocence not based on DNA evidence are cognizable, they must be supported by “new, material, noncumulative and conclusive evidence which meets an extraordinarily high standard, and which undermin[e]s the prosecution's entire case.”).

GUIDRY, J., dissents and would deny the writ.

CLARK, J., dissents and would deny.

GUIDRY, J.,

dissents and would deny the writ.

CLARK, J., dissenting.

I would deny.


Summaries of

State v. Paul

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Nov 2, 2016
202 So. 3d 995 (La. 2016)
Case details for

State v. Paul

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. KERRY J. PAUL

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Nov 2, 2016

Citations

202 So. 3d 995 (La. 2016)

Citing Cases

State v. Ballard

If the district court determines that the relator fails to establish that the State committed a Brady…