From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Page

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1895
21 S.E. 401 (N.C. 1895)

Opinion

(February Term, 1895).

Practice — Failure to Except Until After Verdict — Appeal.

Where defendant in a criminal action made no exception to the evidence or instructions to the jury, but after conviction and refusal of motion for new trial "excepted," without specifying anything to which he excepted, the judgment will be affirmed when no error appears on the record.

INDICTMENT, against B. L. Page et al. for assault and battery, tried before Whitaker, J., at Spring Term, 1894, of ROBESON. The defendants were convicted and appealed.

The Attorney-General for the State.

No counsel contra.


The defendants made no exception to the admission of evidence nor to his Honor's charge. After verdict and rule for new trial discharged, the case states that "defendants excepted," but does not specify anything to which the defendants excepted. We have examined the record and find no error therein.

Affirmed.

Cited: Burnett v. R. R., 120 N.C. 519.

(1017)


Summaries of

State v. Page

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1895
21 S.E. 401 (N.C. 1895)
Case details for

State v. Page

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. B. L. PAGE ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1895

Citations

21 S.E. 401 (N.C. 1895)
116 N.C. 1016

Citing Cases

State v. Giersch

Error. Cited: S. v. Scott, 116 N.C. 1016; S. v. Parker, 139 N.C. 588; S. v. Piner, 141 N.C. 763; S. v. Dowdy,…

Burnett v. R. R

Byrd v. Hudson, 113 N.C. 203; S. v. Brabham, 108 N.C. 793 (on p. 796); S. v. Powell, 106 N.C. 635. The…