From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ott

Supreme Court of Idaho
Feb 6, 1980
605 P.2d 973 (Idaho 1980)

Summary

dealing with Attorney General's duty to represent the State before Idaho Supreme Court

Summary of this case from Mazur v. Hymas

Opinion

No. 13452.

February 6, 1980.

APPEAL FROM THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PAYETTE COUNTY, JAMES R. DOOLITTLE, J.

David Lee Posey, Pros. Atty., Payette, for plaintiff-appellant.

Bert L. Osborn of Welch Osborn, Payette, for defendant-respondent.


The defendant respondent Ott moved to dismiss the appeal filed by the prosecuting attorney of Payette County from an order of the district court dated July 26, 1979, which apparently terminated the above entitled criminal action. Although the notice of appeal was filed on August 29, 1979, the Attorney General of the State of Idaho has not participated by joining in said notice of appeal pursuant to his statutory authority under I.C. § 67-1401(1). Therefore the Court concludes that the appeal is not authorized by the Attorney General and is therefore dismissed.

BISTLINE, J., dissents, noting also that the dismissal entered by the Court is not on the grounds raised by Ott's motion.


Summaries of

State v. Ott

Supreme Court of Idaho
Feb 6, 1980
605 P.2d 973 (Idaho 1980)

dealing with Attorney General's duty to represent the State before Idaho Supreme Court

Summary of this case from Mazur v. Hymas
Case details for

State v. Ott

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles William OTT…

Court:Supreme Court of Idaho

Date published: Feb 6, 1980

Citations

605 P.2d 973 (Idaho 1980)
605 P.2d 973

Citing Cases

State v. Culbertson

Respondent Culbertson also asserts that the instant appeal should have been dismissed since the Payette…

State v. Biggs

The State's notice of appeal was not filed by the office of the attorney general, but by the prosecuting…