In Ossenkop v. State, 86 Neb. 539, 126 N.W. 72, this court said: "In a criminal prosecution, rebuttal testimony on behalf of the state may be given by witnesses whose names were not indorsed on the information."
Summary of this case from Rains v. State(A101059) (S46534).
August 3, 1999.
Petition for review denied.
In Ossenkop v. State, 86 Neb. 539, 126 N.W. 72, this court said: "In a criminal prosecution, rebuttal testimony on behalf of the state may be given by witnesses whose names were not indorsed on the information."
Summary of this case from Rains v. StateIn Ossenkop v. State, 86 Neb. 539, 126 N.W. 72, the rule is stated: "In a criminal prosecution, rebuttal testimony on behalf of the state may be given by witnesses whose names were not endorsed on the information."
Summary of this case from Griffith v. StateFull title:State v. Ossenkop, Tia
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Aug 3, 1999
Whether facts coming to the knowledge of a physician as the result of an autopsical examination are…
State v. MareschWhere the defendant in a prosecution for murder or manslaughter denies the killing or asserts that it was not…