From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Newcome

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Dec 13, 2017
406 P.3d 1133 (Or. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

A161633

12-13-2017

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William Jackson NEWCOME, III, Defendant-Appellant.

David A. Hall argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant. David B. Thompson, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.


David A. Hall argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

David B. Thompson, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and Sercombe, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAMReversed and remanded. State v. Barnthouse , 271 Or. App. 312, 350 P.3d 536 (2015), aff'd on other grounds , 360 Or. 403, 380 P.3d 952 (2016) (holding that, for purposes of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, law enforcement illegally seized a package by removing it from the stream of mail and submitting it to a dog sniff).


Summaries of

State v. Newcome

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Dec 13, 2017
406 P.3d 1133 (Or. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

State v. Newcome

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William Jackson NEWCOME, III…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Date published: Dec 13, 2017

Citations

406 P.3d 1133 (Or. Ct. App. 2017)
289 Or. App. 376