From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Newcome

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Sep 11, 1989
62 Ohio App. 3d 619 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989)

Summary

applying per se rule that attorney's suspension disqualified attorney from status as Sixth Amendment "counsel"

Summary of this case from In re Lewis

Opinion

No. 56877.

Decided September 11, 1989.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County.

John T. Corrigan, Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael Horn, for appellee.

Hyman Friedman, County Public Defender, and David P. Kraus, for appellant.


Defendant Robert Newcome seeks to withdraw his guilty plea to four counts of sexual battery. Defendant's sole assigned error contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at the time he entered his plea because he was represented by counsel who was under suspension. We note that at the time of the plea none of the parties knew that defense counsel was under suspension. Further, the state of Ohio agrees with defendant that he should have the opportunity to withdraw his plea.

The post-sentence withdrawal of a guilty plea is available only to correct manifest injustice. Crim.R. 32.1; State v. Smith (1977), 49 Ohio St.2d 261, 264, 3 O.O.3d 402, 404, 361 N.E.2d 1324, 1326; State v. Peterseim (1980), 68 Ohio App.2d 211, 22 O.O.3d 341, 428 N.E.2d 863, paragraph one of the syllabus. Here, defendant has met his burden of establishing the existence of manifest injustice. Defendant did not receive his constitutional right to the assistance of counsel at the time he pled guilty because he was represented by counsel who was suspended from the practice of law.

Defendant's argument regarding ineffective assistance of counsel is moot because he did not receive his right to counsel in the first place.

Accordingly, defendant's sole assignment of error is sustained.

This cause is reversed and remanded to the Court of Common Pleas for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

PARRINO and WIEST, JJ., concur.

THOMAS J. PARRINO, J., retired, of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting by assignment.

MARK K. WIEST, J., of the Court of Common Pleas of Wayne County, sitting by assignment.


Summaries of

State v. Newcome

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Sep 11, 1989
62 Ohio App. 3d 619 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989)

applying per se rule that attorney's suspension disqualified attorney from status as Sixth Amendment "counsel"

Summary of this case from In re Lewis

In Newcome, the defendant filed a postsentence motion to withdraw his guilty pleas to four counts of sexual battery, arguing that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his defense counsel was under suspension at the time he entered his guilty pleas.

Summary of this case from State v. J.R.
Case details for

State v. Newcome

Case Details

Full title:The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. NEWCOME, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County

Date published: Sep 11, 1989

Citations

62 Ohio App. 3d 619 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989)
577 N.E.2d 125

Citing Cases

State v. J.R.

{¶ 28} In support of her argument, J.R. cites this court's decision in State v. Newcome, 62 Ohio App.3d 619, …

State v. Allen

The trial court noted that McMahon did not represent petitioner at trial, so any denial of the right to…