From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Nelson

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 20, 2006
7 N.Y.3d 883 (N.Y. 2006)

Opinion

Decided November 20, 2006.

APPEAL, by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered March 14, 2006. The Appellate Division affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J.), which had convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees.

People v. Nelson, 27 AD3d 287, affirmed.

Legal Aid Society, New York City ( Lawrence T. Hausman of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York City ( Richard L. Sullivan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Chief Judge KAYEand Judges CIPARICK, ROSENBLATT, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH and PIGOTT.


OPINION OF THE COURT

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Contrary to defendant's contention, the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to substitute counsel, made just prior to jury selection, constituted a proper exercise of discretion ( People v. Linares, 2 NY3d 507). Although the court initially rejected defendant's application without inquiry, it thereafter allowed defendant to voice his concerns about defense counsel. Nor did defense counsel's comments to the court defending his performance create a conflict of interest requiring the court to appoint new counsel ( see generally People v. Quintana, 15 AD3d 299 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 4 NY3d 856 ]2005]; People v. Silva, 15 AD3d 263 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 4 NY3d 857). Therefore, on the record before us, we cannot say that court abused its discretion in finding that the defendant did not establish good cause for such relief ( see People v Medina, 44 NY2d 199).

Defendant's further contention that the court erred in defining the elements of the crime during its preliminary instructions was not preserved for our review ( see People v. Brown, 7 NY3d 880 decided today).

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

State v. Nelson

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 20, 2006
7 N.Y.3d 883 (N.Y. 2006)
Case details for

State v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEIGHTON NELSON…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 20, 2006

Citations

7 N.Y.3d 883 (N.Y. 2006)
826 N.Y.S.2d 593
860 N.E.2d 56

Citing Cases

People v. Washington

Based on his personal observations and inquiry, Supreme Court denied defendant's motion and sentenced him as…

People v. Washington

Based on his personal observations and inquiry, Supreme Court denied defendant's motion and sentenced him as…