From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Neiman

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 2, 1940
12 A.2d 860 (N.J. 1940)

Opinion

Submitted February 16, 1940 —

Decided May 2, 1940.

On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 123 N.J.L. 341.

For the defendant in error, William A. Wachenfeld.

For the plaintiff in error, J. Victor D'Aloia.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Neiman

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 2, 1940
12 A.2d 860 (N.J. 1940)
Case details for

State v. Neiman

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. CHARLES NEIMAN, PLAINTIFF IN…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 2, 1940

Citations

12 A.2d 860 (N.J. 1940)
12 A.2d 860

Citing Cases

State v. Sullivan

In general, the evidence may then be admitted solely to sustain the credibility of the witness. State v.…

State v. Stefanelli

for the purpose of * * * supporting the credibility of a witness, any party including the party calling him…