From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Murray

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 29, 2016
377 P.3d 735 (Wash. 2016)

Opinion

NO. 92930–I

06-29-2016

State of Washington, Petitioner, v. Judith E. Murray, Respondent.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Owens, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its June 28, 2016, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted and this case is consolidated with Supreme Court No. 92944–1, State of Washington v. Darren J. Robison. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d).

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

State v. Murray

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 29, 2016
377 P.3d 735 (Wash. 2016)
Case details for

State v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:State of Washington, Petitioner, v. Judith E. Murray, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Jun 29, 2016

Citations

377 P.3d 735 (Wash. 2016)
185 Wash. 2d 1033
185 Wn. 2d 1033

Citing Cases

State v. Murray

The Court of Appeals affirmed, State v. Murray, noted at 192 Wash.App. 1040, 2016 WL 687195 (2016), and we…