From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Murray

Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 16, 1989
308 Or. 496 (Or. 1989)

Summary

holding that the trial court erred in giving jury instructions that offered alternative theories of murder

Summary of this case from Madison v. Allen

Opinion

TC 10-87-08999; CA A47865; SC S36382

Petition for review filed August 8, 1989

Appeal from judgment of Lane County Circuit Court, George J. Woodrich, Judge. 97 Or. App. 432, 775 P.2d 930 (1989).

Allowed, affirmed, conviction of murder reversed and remanded for further proceedings November 16, 1989

In Banc

Sally L. Avera, Acting Public Defender, and David E. Groom, Salem, for petitioner on review.

Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem, for respondent on review.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The circuit court's judgment of conviction of criminal solicitation is affirmed. The circuit court's judgment of conviction of murder is reversed. Remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings in the light of State v. Boots, 308 Or. 371, 780 P.2d 725 (1989). MEMORANDUM OPINION

Defendant petitions for review of a Court of Appeals decision affirming his convictions of murder and solicitation to murder. ORS 163.115; ORS 161.435. State v. Murray, 97 Or. App. 432, 775 P.2d 930 (1989). Count 1 of the indictment charged alternative theories of murder, viz, intentional murder and felony murder. As concerns defendant's murder conviction, this issue appears to be the same as that in State v. Boots, 308 Or. 371, 780 P.2d 725 (1989), i.e., whether the trial court correctly instructed the jury about the necessity for a unanimous verdict on a single murder theory.

The record here indicates that the trial court erred in instructing the jury. Accordingly, we reverse defendant's murder conviction and remand to the trial court for further consideration in the light of State v. Boots, supra.

As concerns defendant's criminal solicitation conviction, finding no error assigned or claimed as to that conviction, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court.

The petition for review is allowed. The circuit court's judgment of conviction of criminal solicitation is affirmed. The circuit court's judgment of conviction of murder is reversed. Remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings in the light of State v. Boots, 308 Or. 371, 780 P.2d 725 (1989).


Summaries of

State v. Murray

Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 16, 1989
308 Or. 496 (Or. 1989)

holding that the trial court erred in giving jury instructions that offered alternative theories of murder

Summary of this case from Madison v. Allen

holding that the trial court erred in giving jury instructions that offered alternative theories of murder

Summary of this case from Ex Parte Madison
Case details for

State v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. MARK ALAN MURRAY, Petitioner on…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Nov 16, 1989

Citations

308 Or. 496 (Or. 1989)
782 P.2d 157

Citing Cases

State v. Klinge

Id. at 201. See also State v. Murray, 782 P.2d 157 (Or. 1989). In any event, no court has addressed the issue…

Schad v. Arizona

See People v. Milan, 9 Cal.3d 185, 107 Cal.Rptr. 68, 507 P.2d 956 (1973); People v. Travis, 170 Ill. App.3d…