From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Muller

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
Jan 31, 2014
318 P.3d 621 (Haw. Ct. App. 2014)

Summary

In Muller, I concluded that under the liberal construction standard, the charge could within reason be construed to charge a crime, and therefore, Muller's conviction should not be vacated.

Summary of this case from State v. Constantino

Opinion

No. CAAP–10–0000225.

2014-01-31

STATE of Hawai‘i, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Bryan K.A. MULLER, Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (CR. No. 09–1–0879). Paul J. Cunney, Victor J. Bakke, Marcus B. Sierra, Dean C.M. Hoe, Daniel J. Kawamoto, on the briefs, for defendant-appellant. James M. Anderson, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, City and County of Honolulu, on the briefs, for plaintiff-appellee.



Summaries of

State v. Muller

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
Jan 31, 2014
318 P.3d 621 (Haw. Ct. App. 2014)

In Muller, I concluded that under the liberal construction standard, the charge could within reason be construed to charge a crime, and therefore, Muller's conviction should not be vacated.

Summary of this case from State v. Constantino
Case details for

State v. Muller

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Hawai‘i, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Bryan K.A. MULLER…

Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.

Date published: Jan 31, 2014

Citations

318 P.3d 621 (Haw. Ct. App. 2014)
131 Hawaii 331

Citing Cases

State v. McDonnell

The Hawai‘i Supreme Court has set out the four material elements of the offense of Sexual Assault in the…

State v. McDonnell

The Hawai‘i Supreme Court has set out the four material elements of the offense of Sexual Assault in the…