From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Dec 20, 2016
794 S.E.2d 922 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016)

Summary

holding the privilege could have been available to an assault-with-a-deadly-weapon-inflicting serious-injury crime, unclear from the opinion, but this crime is either intentionally or knowingly done; holding no evidence supported self-defense, so that privilege had no bearing on the instant case

Summary of this case from State v. Betts

Opinion

No. COA16-448

12-20-2016

State of North Carolina v. Meredith Anthony Mitchell, Defendant.

Attorney General Roy A. Cooper III, by Special Deputy Attorney General Creecy C. Johnson, for the State. Dylan J.C. Buffum, for defendant-appellant.


NO ERROR.


Summaries of

State v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Dec 20, 2016
794 S.E.2d 922 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016)

holding the privilege could have been available to an assault-with-a-deadly-weapon-inflicting serious-injury crime, unclear from the opinion, but this crime is either intentionally or knowingly done; holding no evidence supported self-defense, so that privilege had no bearing on the instant case

Summary of this case from State v. Betts
Case details for

State v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:State of North Carolina v. Meredith Anthony Mitchell, Defendant.

Court:Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Date published: Dec 20, 2016

Citations

794 S.E.2d 922 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

State v. Betts

eople v. Getter , 389 Ill.Dec. 301, 26 N.E.3d 391 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015) (extending privilege to aggravated…