From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Miranda

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 2, 2000
747 A.2d 5 (Conn. 2000)

Opinion

Decided March 2, 2000


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 298 (AC 14439), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Was there sufficient evidence to convict the defendant of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a)(3), and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 53-21?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the assault convictions deprived the defendant of due process of law under the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution?

"3. Do the defendant's convictions of two counts of assault in the first degree violate the prohibition against double jeopardy under the United States constitution?

"4. Do the defendant's convictions for assault in the first degree and risk of injury to a child violate the prohibition against double jeopardy under the United States constitution?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16271x01.

Susan M. Cormier, in support of the petition.

Robert J. Scheinblum, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Miranda

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 2, 2000
747 A.2d 5 (Conn. 2000)
Case details for

State v. Miranda

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. SANTOS MIRANDA

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Mar 2, 2000

Citations

747 A.2d 5 (Conn. 2000)
252 Conn. 936
252 Conn. 935

Citing Cases

State v. Miranda

The trial court imposed a sentence of 10 years on each conviction to be served consecutively one to the other…

Lafreniere v. Burns

Thus, wilful misconduct is intentional misconduct, which is conduct done purposefully and with knowledge of…