From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Meadows

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 20, 2018
330 Conn. 947 (Conn. 2018)

Opinion

11-20-2018

STATE of Connecticut v. Cody MEADOWS

John L. Cordani, Jr., assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Bruce R. Lockwood, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 185 Conn.App. 287, ___ A.3d ___ (2018), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that (1) the defendant's constitutional right to be free from double jeopardy was not violated when he was convicted of two counts of violation of a standing criminal protective order on the basis of different words spoken to the protected person during a single, brief, and uninterrupted statement, and (2) the jury was properly instructed that to `harass' means to `trouble, worry or torment' for purposes of an enhanced penalty for violating a standing criminal protective order?"


Summaries of

State v. Meadows

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 20, 2018
330 Conn. 947 (Conn. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Meadows

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Cody MEADOWS

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Nov 20, 2018

Citations

330 Conn. 947 (Conn. 2018)
196 A.3d 327

Citing Cases

State v. Cody M.

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issues: "Did the…

State v. Brown

Because the defendant's claims raise questions of statutory interpretation and the constitutionality of…