From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McElroy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 21, 1997
689 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-1

Opinion Filed February 21, 1997 Rehearing Denied March 26, 1997

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Jose R. Rodriguez, Judge.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Sharon Lee Stedman of Sharon Lee Stedman, P.A., and John L. Woodard, III, of John L. Woodard, III, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.


The State appeals the order dismissing McElroy's criminal drug charges on the basis that McElroy had been placed in jeopardy for the offenses in a prior forfeiture proceeding. At the time he entered the order, the trial judge did not have the benefit of the decision in United States v. Ursery, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 2135, 135 L.Ed.2d 549 (1996) (holding that in rem civil forfeiture proceedings are neither punishment nor criminal proceedings for purposes of the double jeopardy clause) or this court's decision in Llewellyn v. State, 682 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (same).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

PETERSON, C.J., and HARRIS, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. McElroy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 21, 1997
689 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

State v. McElroy

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. DANIEL LEE McELROY, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 21, 1997

Citations

689 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)