From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Aug 14, 2020
300 So. 3d 847 (La. 2020)

Opinion

No. 2019-KH-01380

08-14-2020

STATE of Louisiana v. Leon MCDONALD


Writ application denied. See per curiam.

ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF OUACHITA

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to the remaining claims, applicant fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.


Summaries of

State v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Aug 14, 2020
300 So. 3d 847 (La. 2020)
Case details for

State v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Louisiana v. Leon MCDONALD

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Aug 14, 2020

Citations

300 So. 3d 847 (La. 2020)

Citing Cases

McDonald v. Goodwin

Petitioner sought further review before the Supreme Court of Louisiana, [doc. # 5, p. 88], and on August 14,…