From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mathews

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two
Mar 19, 1971
482 P.2d 812 (Wash. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

No. 247-2.

March 19, 1971.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 4067, Robert Arkell, J., entered April 30, 1970.

George E. Twining, for appellant (appointed counsel for appeal).

Henry R. Dunn, Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.


Affirmed.

Prosecution for larceny. Defendant appeals from a conviction and sentence.


Defendant has appealed from a conviction of grand larceny. Defendant's court-appointed counsel on appeal has filed an Anders brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967).

Defendant's counsel has moved to withdraw and the prosecuting attorney moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was frivolous.

We have reviewed the record and agree that no meritorious issues are presented by the record. Both motions are granted and the judgment and sentence is affirmed.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

State v. Mathews

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two
Mar 19, 1971
482 P.2d 812 (Wash. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

State v. Mathews

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. HUBERT BENNY MATHEWS, Appellant

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two

Date published: Mar 19, 1971

Citations

482 P.2d 812 (Wash. Ct. App. 1971)
482 P.2d 812
4 Wash. App. 506

Citing Cases

State v. Mathews

We have reviewed the record and agree that no meritorious issues are presented in the record as to the grand…

State v. Borsey

We have performed the functions required by Anders v. California, supra. The legal points which portended…