From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Massaro

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 7, 2021
340 Conn. 908 (Conn. 2021)

Opinion

12-07-2021

STATE of Connecticut v. John A. MASSARO

Lisa J. Steele, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Nancy L. Chupak, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Lisa J. Steele, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Nancy L. Chupak, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 205 Conn. App. 687, 258 A.3d 735 (AC 43323), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that any sanction the trial court improperly imposed on counsel for violating discovery rules was harmless?

"2. Even if, as the Appellate Court assumed, the trial court's rulings on the state's cross-examination of the defendant's investigator improperly permitted the prosecutor to convert him into an expert witness regarding the narcotics trade after the parties had agreed not to present expert testimony on that topic, did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that any such error was harmless?"


Summaries of

State v. Massaro

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 7, 2021
340 Conn. 908 (Conn. 2021)
Case details for

State v. Massaro

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. John A. MASSARO

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Dec 7, 2021

Citations

340 Conn. 908 (Conn. 2021)
264 A.3d 1001

Citing Cases

State v. Massaro

And "(2) [e]ven if, as the Appellate Court assumed, the trial court's rulings on the [prosecutor's]…