From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 25, 1986
506 A.2d 1035 (Conn. 1986)

Opinion

(12692)

Argued March 4, 1986

Decision released March 25, 1986

Substitute information charging the defendant with the crime of larceny in the second degree, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Waterbury, geographical area number four, and tried to the jury before Smith, J.; verdict and judgment of guilty, from which the defendant appealed to the Appellate Court, Hull, Spallone and Daly, Js., which affirmed the trial court's judgment, and the defendant, on the granting of certification, appealed to this court. Appeal dismissed.

Louis S. Avitabile, with whom, on the brief, was Richard v. Ackerson, for the appellant (defendant).

Marcia B. Smith, assistant state's attorney, with whom were Patricia King, deputy assistant state's attorney, and, on the brief, John Connelly, state's attorney, for the appellee (state).


After examining the record on appeal and after considering the briefs and the arguments of the parties, we have concluded that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted. The issues have been fully considered in the opinion of the Appellate Court; State v. Marshall, 3 Conn. App. 126, 485 A.2d 930 (1985); and it would serve no useful purpose for us to repeat the discussion therein contained.


Summaries of

State v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 25, 1986
506 A.2d 1035 (Conn. 1986)
Case details for

State v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. KEITH MARSHALL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Mar 25, 1986

Citations

506 A.2d 1035 (Conn. 1986)
199 Conn. 244

Citing Cases

State v. Kari

The certified issue was fully considered in the opinion of the Appellate Court; id., 292; and it would serve…