From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Marcum

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 28, 2015
2015 Ohio 239 (Ohio 2015)

Opinion

NO. 2014-2122

01-28-2015

State v. Marcum


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals' entry filed December 5, 2014:

"[D]oes the test outlined by the [c]ourt in State v. Kalish apply in reviewing felony sentences after the passage of R.C. 2953.08(G)?"

O'DONNELL, J., dissents.

The conflict cases are State v. Hill, 7th Dist. Carroll No. 13CA892, 2014-Ohio-1965, and State v. Simmons, 9th Dist. Summit No. 27197, 2014-Ohio-4191.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2014-1825, State v. Marcum, 4th Dist. Gallia No. 13CA11, 2014-Ohio-4048.


Summaries of

State v. Marcum

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 28, 2015
2015 Ohio 239 (Ohio 2015)
Case details for

State v. Marcum

Case Details

Full title:State v. Marcum

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 28, 2015

Citations

2015 Ohio 239 (Ohio 2015)
141 Ohio St. 3d 1453
23 N.E.3d 1195

Citing Cases

State v. Wellington

); State v. Murphy, 10th Dist. No. 12AP-952, 2013-Ohio-5599, ¶ 12; State v. Crawford, 12th Dist. No.…

State v. Williams

{¶ 45} The issue of which standard of review an appellate court must undertake is currently before the Ohio…