From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Marcello E.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 17, 2023
346 Conn. 901 (Conn. 2023)

Opinion

01-17-2023

STATE of Connecticut v. MARCELLO E.

John R. Weikart, assigned counsel, and Emily Graner Sexton, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Kathryn W. Bare, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


John R. Weikart, assigned counsel, and Emily Graner Sexton, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Kathryn W. Bare, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 216 Conn. App. 1, 283 A.3d 1007 (2022), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had not abused its discretion by admitting evidence of uncharged misconduct to establish intent in the present case?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that any error in the trial court's admission of evidence of uncharged misconduct was harmless?"

ROBINSON, C. J., and ALEXANDER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

State v. Marcello E.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 17, 2023
346 Conn. 901 (Conn. 2023)
Case details for

State v. Marcello E.

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. MARCELLO E.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jan 17, 2023

Citations

346 Conn. 901 (Conn. 2023)
287 A.3d 136