From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Madrigal

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 24, 1998
699 N.E.2d 950 (Ohio 1998)

Opinion

97-98.

September 24, 1998.

Lucas App. No. CR965761. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County. Upon consideration of appellees motion for release of portion of record under seal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for release of portion of record under seal be, and hereby is, denied.

MOYER, C.J., concurs and would also strike the sealed portion from the record.

DOUGLAS, J., concurs and would also strike the sealed memo.

LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concurs and notes that the court should not consider the portion of record under seal as not part of the record.

PFEIFER, J., would review the sealed record and consider releasing then.


MOTION DOCKET


Summaries of

State v. Madrigal

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 24, 1998
699 N.E.2d 950 (Ohio 1998)
Case details for

State v. Madrigal

Case Details

Full title:State v. Madrigal

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Sep 24, 1998

Citations

699 N.E.2d 950 (Ohio 1998)
83 Ohio St. 3d 1437

Citing Cases

State v. Madrigal

We denied the motion. State v. Madrigal (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 1437, 699 N.E.2d 950. The contents of the…