From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Luna

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Jun 14, 1968
79 N.M. 307 (N.M. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

No. 124.

June 14, 1968.

Appeal from the District Court, Dona Ana County, Edward E. Triviz, D. J.

R. E. Riordan, Las Cruces, for defendant-appellant.

Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Spencer T. King, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.


OPINION


Appealing from a denial of post conviction relief, defendant contends that he is entitled to credit on his sentence for time spent in presentence confinement. He relies on Sec. 40A-29-25, NMSA 1953 (Supp. 1967), which provides for such a credit.

Defendant's presentence confinement time occurred prior to the effective date of Sec. 40A-29-25, supra. Sec. 40A-29-25 is not to be given retroactive effect. State v. Sedillo (Ct.App.), 79 N.M. 289, 442 P.2d 601, decided May 24, 1968. State v. Padilla, 78 N.M. 702, 437 P.2d 163 (Ct.App. 1968); see State v. Sedillo, 79 N.M. 9, 439 P.2d 226 (1968).

The Order denying relief is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

SPIESS, C. J., and OMAN, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Luna

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Jun 14, 1968
79 N.M. 307 (N.M. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

State v. Luna

Case Details

Full title:STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert LUNA, Defendant-Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Date published: Jun 14, 1968

Citations

79 N.M. 307 (N.M. Ct. App. 1968)
442 P.2d 797

Citing Cases

State v. Mears

Padilla is not applicable here for the reason that in Padilla defendant was convicted and sentenced before…

State v. Dalrymple

In a number of recent cases this court has held that this statute is not to be given retroactive effect.…