From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lomax

Springfield Court of Appeals, Missouri
Aug 16, 1971
470 S.W.2d 161 (Mo. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

No. 9127.

August 16, 1971.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, JASPER COUNTY, WOODSON OLDHAM, J.

No appearance, for respondent.

Nolen Berry, Blanchard, Van Fleet, Robertson Dermott, Joplin, for appellant.


By information filed in the Circuit Court of Jasper County, it was charged that on or about September 10, 1970, defendant "did wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously have in his possession, and under his control, a certain narcotic drug, to-wit: marihuana." § 195.020. The jury found defendant guilty but could not agree upon the punishment, and the trial court (Crim.Rule 27.03) assessed his punishment in the county jail for a period of one year. § 195.200, subd. 1(1). After due proceedings, defendant appealed to this court.

Statutory and rule references are to RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., and to Missouri Supreme Court Rules of Criminal Procedure, V.A.M.R.

Sec. 195.200 — "1. Any person violating any provision of this chapter is punishable as follows: (1) For the first narcotic offense, * * * by imprisonment in a state correctional institution for a term of not more than twenty years, or by imprisonment in a county jail for a term of not less than six months nor more than one year."

"The term 'felony', when used in * * * any * * * statute, shall be construed to mean any offense for which the offender, on conviction, is liable by law to be punished with death or imprisonment in a correctional institution of the state department of corrections, and no other." § 556.020. Although defendant's punishment was assessed at imprisonment in a county jail for one year, he was convicted of an offense punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary; hence, defendant has been charged with and convicted of a felony. State v. Echols, Mo., 467 S.W.2d 893, 896(4). "The supreme court shall have exclusive appellate jurisdiction * * * in all cases of felony." Constitution of Missouri, art. V, § 3, V.A.M.S. It is our duty to determine, ex mero motu, if we possess appellate jurisdiction [Kansas City v. Howe, Mo.App., 416 S.W.2d 683, 686(2-3)], and as it appears that we do not, our only authority in this matter is to transfer the cause to the Supreme Court of Missouri. Constitution of Missouri, art. V, § 11, V.A.M.S.; Nance v. Kimbrow, Mo.App., 460 S.W.2d 290, 291(1). It is so ordered.

All concur.


Summaries of

State v. Lomax

Springfield Court of Appeals, Missouri
Aug 16, 1971
470 S.W.2d 161 (Mo. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

State v. Lomax

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. VINCENT LAFAYETTE LOMAX, APPELLANT

Court:Springfield Court of Appeals, Missouri

Date published: Aug 16, 1971

Citations

470 S.W.2d 161 (Mo. Ct. App. 1971)

Citing Cases

State v. Smith

Defendant argues that since the statute authorizes punishment in the penitentiary, or in the county jail not…

Moses v. Carnahan

If it appears that we do not have jurisdiction, but that the Supreme Court of Missouri does, our only…