From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Loiseau

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 15, 1988
114 N.J. 303 (N.J. 1988)

Summary

In Loiseau v. State, 114 Ala. 34, 22 So. 138, 139, 62 Am.St.Rep. 84, appears the following definition of a lottery: "Whatever may be the name or character of the machine or scheme, if in its use a consideration is paid, and there is gambling, the hazarding of small amounts to win larger, the result of winning or losing to be determined by chance, in which neither the will nor skill of man can operate to influence the result, it is a determination by 'lot,' within the comprehensive word 'lottery' used in the constitution of this state."

Summary of this case from Opinion of the Justices

Opinion

November 15, 1988.


Petition for certification denied.


Summaries of

State v. Loiseau

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 15, 1988
114 N.J. 303 (N.J. 1988)

In Loiseau v. State, 114 Ala. 34, 22 So. 138, 139, 62 Am.St.Rep. 84, appears the following definition of a lottery: "Whatever may be the name or character of the machine or scheme, if in its use a consideration is paid, and there is gambling, the hazarding of small amounts to win larger, the result of winning or losing to be determined by chance, in which neither the will nor skill of man can operate to influence the result, it is a determination by 'lot,' within the comprehensive word 'lottery' used in the constitution of this state."

Summary of this case from Opinion of the Justices

In Loiseau v. State, 114 Ala. 34, the operation of a similar machine was described, and it was said that those playing against them were guilty of gambling.

Summary of this case from Kuhl v. M. Gally Universal Press Co.
Case details for

State v. Loiseau

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KENOL LOISEAU

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 15, 1988

Citations

114 N.J. 303 (N.J. 1988)
554 A.2d 856

Citing Cases

State v. Coats

, 4 N.E.2d 241; Johnson v. State, 137 Ala. 101 ( 34 So. 1018); Loiseau v. State, 114 Ala. 34 ( 22 So. 138, 62…

Opinion of the Justices

In Buckalew v. State, 62 Ala. 334, 34 Am.Rep. 22, this court took a restricted view as to what constitutes a…