From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lippolis

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 2, 1970
55 N.J. 354 (N.J. 1970)

Summary

adopting dissent which construed IAD time deadlines

Summary of this case from State v. Johnson

Opinion

Argued February 17, 1970 —

Decided March 2, 1970.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Solomon Forman argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Robert N. McAllister, Jr., Atlantic County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. Ernest M. Curtis, of counsel).

Mr. Richard Newman, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).


The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Kolovsky in the Appellate Division, 107 N.J. Super. 137.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For affirmance — None.


Summaries of

State v. Lippolis

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 2, 1970
55 N.J. 354 (N.J. 1970)

adopting dissent which construed IAD time deadlines

Summary of this case from State v. Johnson
Case details for

State v. Lippolis

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LOUIS JOSEPH LIPPOLIS…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 2, 1970

Citations

55 N.J. 354 (N.J. 1970)
262 A.2d 203

Citing Cases

State v. Pero

We have previously held that the State may seek a continuance even after expiration of the 180-day period, so…

State v. Wells

He relies on a number of cases which have held, in similar settings, that defendants cannot be saddled with…