From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Linares

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Nov 4, 1993
634 A.2d 299 (Conn. 1993)

Opinion

(14861)

Decided November 4, 1993


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 656 (AC 10910), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Whether the defendant's motion to dismiss should have been granted because General Statutes 2-1d is overbroad, in violation of the Connecticut constitution and the United States constitution?

"2. Whether the defendant's motion to dismiss should have been granted because General Statutes 2-1d is vague on its face, in violation of the Connecticut constitution and the United States constitution?

"3. Whether the defendant's motion to dismiss should have been granted because General Statutes 2-1d is vague as applied in the instant case, in violation of the Connecticut constitution and the United States constitution?

"4. Whether the trial court should have granted the defendant's motion to dismiss because the state sought to punish her for political expression protected by the Connecticut constitution and the United States constitution?"


Timothy H. Everett, in support of the petition.


Summaries of

State v. Linares

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Nov 4, 1993
634 A.2d 299 (Conn. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Linares

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. KATHALEEN LINARES

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Nov 4, 1993

Citations

634 A.2d 299 (Conn. 1993)
634 A.2d 299

Citing Cases

State v. Linares

"4. Whether the trial court should have granted the defendant's motion to dismiss because the state sought to…