From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lawrence

Oregon Supreme Court
Sep 9, 1994
880 P.2d 431 (Or. 1994)

Opinion

DC 903896; CA A70304; SC S39919

Argued and submitted August 31, 1993

September 9, 1994

Jeffrey C. Hollen, of Richardson, Ouderkirk Hollen, Newport, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review.

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Peterson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis, and Graber, Justices.

Peterson, J., retired December 31, 1993.


Affirmed by an equally divided court.

Unis, J., dissented and filed an opinion.


In my view, the decision of the Court of Appeals in this case should be vacated, and this case should be remanded to the Court of Appeals in light of this court's decision in State v. Nagel, 320 Or. 24, 880 P.2d 451 (1994).


Summaries of

State v. Lawrence

Oregon Supreme Court
Sep 9, 1994
880 P.2d 431 (Or. 1994)
Case details for

State v. Lawrence

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. THOMAS ELDRIDGE LAWRENCE…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Sep 9, 1994

Citations

880 P.2d 431 (Or. 1994)
880 P.2d 431

Citing Cases

Winroth v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services

Government conduct is a "search" under Article I, section 9, when it " ' "significantly impair[s] an…

State v. Prickett

The trial court ruled that, because defendant had not been advised of the consequences of refusing to take…