From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Larson

Supreme Court of Minnesota
May 13, 1977
254 N.W.2d 380 (Minn. 1977)

Opinion

No. 47400.

May 13, 1977.

Appeal from the District Court, Blue Earth County, Miles B. Zimmerman, J.

Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, David J. Twa, Asst. County Atty., Mankato, for appellant.

Charles A. Adamson, Mankato, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.


This is an appeal by the state pursuant to Rule 29.03, Rules of Criminal Procedure, from a pretrial omnibus hearing order of the district court denying a motion by the defendant to dismiss a felony prosecution on the ground that he was not brought before the magistrate within 36 hours after his arrest as required by Rule 4.02, subd. 5(1), Rules of Criminal Procedure. The district court, although refusing to dismiss the case, ruled that the state had violated the 36-hour rule and that the proper sanction is to exclude any evidence obtained improperly on account of the delay.

The order denying defendant's motion to dismiss obviously was not adverse to the state. We accordingly have no occasion to decide the correctness of the trial court's interpretation of the rule, except to note that the relevant rules for computation of time have since been amended, effective July 1, 1977.

The order suppressing any evidence obtained during that period does not in a practical sense appear to be adverse to the state, for there is nothing in this record to suggest that there was any evidence which would actually be suppressed. We accordingly have no occasion to now determine whether suppression is an appropriate sanction for violation by the 36-hour rule.

Defendant, having filed no brief on this appeal, is not entitled to any statutory award for attorneys fees.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

State v. Larson

Supreme Court of Minnesota
May 13, 1977
254 N.W.2d 380 (Minn. 1977)
Case details for

State v. Larson

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Terry Joe LARSON, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: May 13, 1977

Citations

254 N.W.2d 380 (Minn. 1977)

Citing Cases

State v. Wiberg

The comment to Rule 4.02 states: "The effect of failure to comply with [the rule] on the admission of * * *…

State v. Hendrickson

Respondent has filed a brief and is entitled to reasonable attorney fees. See e.g., State v. Larson, 254…