From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lanish

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 2, 1969
253 A.2d 545 (N.J. 1969)

Opinion

Argued May 9, 1969 —

Decided June 2, 1969.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 103 N.J. Super. 441.

Mr. Remo M. Croce, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).

Mr. Victor Friedman argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Louis A. Smith on the brief).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division, 103 N.J. Super. 441.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN. — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Lanish

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 2, 1969
253 A.2d 545 (N.J. 1969)
Case details for

State v. Lanish

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MATTHEW LANISH…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 2, 1969

Citations

253 A.2d 545 (N.J. 1969)
253 A.2d 545

Citing Cases

State v. Tropea

In a number of cases the defense of double jeopardy has been applied to motor vehicle prosecutions. E.g.,…

State v. Sweeney

A prosecution for driving under the influence of alcohol is in the nature of a quasi-criminal offense. State…