From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lane

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 2009
363 N.C. 121 (N.C. 2009)

Summary

instructing the trial judge to determine whether defendant fell within the category of "borderline-competent" or "gray-area" defendants who are "competent enough to stand trial ... but who still suffer from severe mental illness to the point where they are not competent to conduct trial proceedings by themselves"

Summary of this case from State v. Lane

Opinion

No. 606A05.

9 March 2009.


ORDER ORDER

The Court allows the State's Motion for Clarification to the extent discussed herein. In clarification of its opinion in State v. Lane, 362 N.C. 667, 669 S.E.2d 321 (2008), the Court orders the following:

(1) The question of whether defendant comes within the category of "borderline-competent" (or "gray-area") defendants, as defined by the Supreme Court of the United States in Indiana v. Edwards, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 128 S. Ct. 2379, 2384-88, 171 L. Ed. 2d 345, 353-57 (2008), shall be determined after hearing by Judge D. Jack Hooks, Jr.

Only if the first inquiry is answered in the affirmative should the trial court proceed to this second issue:

(2) If Judge Hooks determines defendant is "borderline-competent," Judge Hooks shall then decide whether, in his discretion, he would have precluded self-representation for defendant and appointed counsel for him pursuant to Indiana v. Edwards.

Only if the second inquiry is answered in the affirmative should the trial court proceed to this third issue:

(3) If Judge Hooks decides he would have precluded self-representation for defendant and appointed counsel for him pursuant to Indiana v. Edwards, the question of whether defendant was prejudiced by his period of self-representation shall be determined after hearing by Judge Gary E. Trawick.

The scope and extent of each hearing is to be determined by the trial court. The trial court is directed to hold the necessary hearings, make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and certify its findings and conclusions to this Court within 120 days of the filing date of this order.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 9th day of March, 2009.

s/Hudson, J. For the Court


Summaries of

State v. Lane

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 2009
363 N.C. 121 (N.C. 2009)

instructing the trial judge to determine whether defendant fell within the category of "borderline-competent" or "gray-area" defendants who are "competent enough to stand trial ... but who still suffer from severe mental illness to the point where they are not competent to conduct trial proceedings by themselves"

Summary of this case from State v. Lane
Case details for

State v. Lane

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ERIC GLENN LANE

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 2009

Citations

363 N.C. 121 (N.C. 2009)
706 S.E.2d 775

Citing Cases

State v. Lytle

Godinez, 509 U.S. at 396-98, 113 S. Ct. at 2685-86, 125 L. Ed. 2d at 330-31. However, "the United States…

State v. Lane

On 12 December 2008, this Court remanded the case to the trial court for a further hearing to determine…