From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Kyger

Supreme Court of Oregon.
Apr 21, 2022
369 Or. 604 (Or. 2022)

Opinion

CC 17CR08793 (SC S068337)

04-21-2022

STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Scott William KYGER, Petitioner on Review.

Anne Fujita Munsey, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, Salem, filed the petition for reconsideration on behalf of petitioner on review. Also on the petition was Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender. No appearance contra.


Anne Fujita Munsey, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, Salem, filed the petition for reconsideration on behalf of petitioner on review. Also on the petition was Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender.

No appearance contra.

Before Walters, Chief Justice, and Balmer, Flynn, Duncan, Nelson, Garrett, and DeHoog, Justices.

GARRETT, J.

Defendant has petitioned for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Kyger , 369 Or. 363, 506 P.3d 376 (2022), objecting to the phrasing of footnote 3, which stated:

"Although defendant raised other issues in his petition for review, he failed to present any briefing or argument on those issues. Accordingly, we do not reach them."

Id. at 367 n. 3, 506 P.3d 376. In his petition, defendant correctly points out that this court's order allowing review expressly limited review to the issue that we addressed in our opinion. Footnote 3 implies that defendant had, and abandoned, an opportunity to present argument on other issues. That is incorrect. Accordingly, we replace the text of footnote 3, quoted above, with the following:

"Although defendant raised other issues in his petition for review, we denied review on those issues, and they are not before us."

The petition for reconsideration is allowed. The former opinion is modified and adhered to as modified.


Summaries of

State v. Kyger

Supreme Court of Oregon.
Apr 21, 2022
369 Or. 604 (Or. 2022)
Case details for

State v. Kyger

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Scott William KYGER, Petitioner…

Court:Supreme Court of Oregon.

Date published: Apr 21, 2022

Citations

369 Or. 604 (Or. 2022)
509 P.3d 112

Citing Cases

State v. Wesley

"An ‘attempt’ under ORS 161.405(1) requires an act that is ‘strongly corroborative of the actor's criminal…

State v. McDonald

Proving attempt liability necessarily requires the factfinder to make an inference about the actor's…