From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Kendrick

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 20, 2012
35 A.3d 1076 (Conn. 2012)

Opinion

2012-01-20

STATE of Connecticut v. Said KENDRICK.

Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition. James B. Streeto, assistant public defender, in opposition.


Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition. James B. Streeto, assistant public defender, in opposition.

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn.App. 473, 31 A.3d 1189 (2011), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court improperly denied the defendant's motion to suppress based upon the exigent circumstances of a warrantless entry?”


Summaries of

State v. Kendrick

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 20, 2012
35 A.3d 1076 (Conn. 2012)
Case details for

State v. Kendrick

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Said KENDRICK.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jan 20, 2012

Citations

35 A.3d 1076 (Conn. 2012)
303 Conn. 925

Citing Cases

State v. Kendrick

This court granted the state's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following question: “Did…

State v. Kendrick

This court granted the state's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following question: "Did…