From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. J.T. Baker Chemical Company

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Feb 21, 1991
246 N.J. Super. 224 (App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

Argued February 4, 1991 —

Decided February 21, 1991.

Before Judges PETRELLA, BILDER and MUIR, Jr.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Warren County.

Ronald P. Heksch, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent ( Douglas S. Eakeley, Acting Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Michael R. Clancy, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Ronald P. Heksch, on the brief).

Theodore L. Garrett, of the Washington, D.C. Bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant ( Hannoch Weisman, attorneys; Theodore L. Garrett and Irvin M. Freilich, on the brief).


Affirmed substantially for the reasons given in Judge Diana's opinion of April 28, 1989, reported at 234 N.J. Super. 234, 560 A.2d 739 (Ch.Div. 1989). We are satisfied his factual findings are supported by substantial credible evidence in the record. See Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474 , 484, 323 A.2d 495 (1974).


Summaries of

State v. J.T. Baker Chemical Company

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Feb 21, 1991
246 N.J. Super. 224 (App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

State v. J.T. Baker Chemical Company

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Feb 21, 1991

Citations

246 N.J. Super. 224 (App. Div. 1991)
587 A.2d 279

Citing Cases

White Oak v. Winning

"If it had been the legislature's intent to include within the scope of the statute a continued flowing or…

United States v. CDMG Realty Co.

Id. at 96, 509 A.2d 225. See also State, D.E.P. v. J.T. Baker Co., 234 N.J. Super. 234, 240, 560 A.2d 739…