From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Joseph

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 9, 2008
2008 Ohio 3369 (Ohio 2008)

Opinion

No. 2008-1005.

July 9, 2008.

Allen App. No. 1-07-50, 2008-Ohio-1138.


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals' Journal Entry filed April 22, 2008:

"May a trial court impose court costs pursuant to R.C. 2947.23 in its sentencing entry, when it did not impose those costs in open court at the sentencing hearing?"

CUPP, J., not participating.

The conflict cases are State v. Peacock, Lake App. No. 2002-L-115, 2003-Ohio-6772, State v. Smoot, Franklin App. No. 05AP-104, 2005-Ohio-5326, and State v. Triplett, Cuyahoga App. No. 87788, 2007-Ohio-75.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2008-0711, State v. Joseph, Allen App. No. 1-07-50, 2008-Ohio-1138.


Summaries of

State v. Joseph

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 9, 2008
2008 Ohio 3369 (Ohio 2008)
Case details for

State v. Joseph

Case Details

Full title:State v. Joseph

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jul 9, 2008

Citations

2008 Ohio 3369 (Ohio 2008)
118 Ohio St. 3d 1504

Citing Cases

State v. Throckmorton

Other courts have ruled that under Crim. R. 43(A), which requires the defendant's presence during the…

State v. Gleckler

{¶ 39} The issue is currently pending before the Ohio Supreme Court. See State v. Joseph, 118 Ohio St.3d…