From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 30, 1992
224 Conn. 911 (Conn. 1992)

Opinion

(14629)

Decided October 30, 1992


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 708 [AC 10015], is granted, limited to the following questions:

"1. Was the Appellate Court correct in refusing to review the defendant's claim that the trial court improperly denied his motion to dismiss which claimed that a peace officer does not have probable cause to effectuate a warrantless arrest for a misdemeanor committed outside the presence of that officer?

"2. In order to establish a violation of General Statutes 14-224(b), must the state prove that the defendant knew that the accident in which he was involved caused `injury or damage to property?'"


Mario Paul Mikolitch, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 30, 1992
224 Conn. 911 (Conn. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. EDWARD F. JOHNSON

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Oct 30, 1992

Citations

224 Conn. 911 (Conn. 1992)
617 A.2d 168

Citing Cases

State v. Joyce

As a result, this court need not independently undertake to engage in such an analysis. State v. Birch, 219…

State v. Johnson

We granted certification to appeal limited to two issues: "(1) Was the Appellate Court correct in refusing to…