From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Johns

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Sep 11, 1997
569 N.W.2d 180 (Minn. 1997)

Summary

reversing conviction based on the reasoning set forth in State v. Carter, 569 N.W.2d 169 (Minn. 1997)

Summary of this case from State v. Carter

Opinion

No. C9-95-1765.

September 11, 1997.

John M. Stuart, Minnesota State Public Defender by Bradford Colbert, Assistant State Public Defender, St. Paul, for Appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Minnesota Attorney General, St. Paul, James C. Backstrom, Dakota County Attorney by Phillip D. Prokopowicz, Assistant Dakota County Attorney, Hastings, for Respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.


OPINION


The defendant, Melvin Johns, is a co-defendant of Wayne Thomas Carter. The facts and legal issues are identical in both cases.

Based on our reasoning in the companion case of State v. Carter, 569 N.W.2d 169, 178-179 (Minn.), the decision of the court of appeals is reversed.


For the reasons set forth in my dissent in State v. Carter, I respectfully dissent.


I join in the dissent of Justice STRINGER.


I join in the dissent of Justice STRINGER.


Summaries of

State v. Johns

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Sep 11, 1997
569 N.W.2d 180 (Minn. 1997)

reversing conviction based on the reasoning set forth in State v. Carter, 569 N.W.2d 169 (Minn. 1997)

Summary of this case from State v. Carter
Case details for

State v. Johns

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Melvin JOHNS, Petitioner, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Sep 11, 1997

Citations

569 N.W.2d 180 (Minn. 1997)

Citing Cases

State v. Carter

Id. at 179-81. Johns' conviction was reversed in State v. Johns, 569 N.W.2d 180 (Minn. 1997) (reversing…

Minnesota v. Carter

We, therefore, hold that [respondents] had standing to bring [their] motion to suppress the evidence gathered…